To: | Ontology Summit 2011 discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Antoinette Arsic <aarsic@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:25:16 +0000 (UTC) |
Message-id: | <674108045.1652233.1298874316302.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Ah, thank you so much John. I was only coming up with Level of Detail : ) Interesting! I've only been working with Aerotext for NLP and TopBraid Composer and Protege for ontology development. Antoinette Arsic Have a great day! ----- Original Message ----- From: "John F. Sowa" <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 9:45:55 PM Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] [Making the Case] Barriers to adoption of ontologies On 2/27/2011 5:08 PM, Antoinette Arsic wrote: > I have searched and cannot find in context what LOD stands for. > I'd like to learn more about that. I should have spelled out the acronym at first use. LOD stands for Linked Open Data. The term was coined by Tim B-L: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html A prototypical example is DBpedia, which makes facts in the Wikipedia accessible by DB-style queries: http://dbpedia.org/About DBpedia has a rudimentary ontology, but it's closer to a terminology than an axiomatized ontology. However, the overwhelming amount of data on the WWW doesn't obey Tim's rules. Therefore, it's necessary to develop methods for analyzing raw natural language text. IBM Watson takes advantage of LOD, including the DBpedia, but it also does an enormous amount of analysis of raw English text. Even for data that is in the DBpedia and other LOD resources, Watson can't rely on the ontology because the way things are classified in those ontologies rarely correspond to the way a Jeopardy question would classify them. John _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ _________________________________________________________________ Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2011/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2011 Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] [Making the Case] Barriers to adoption of ontologies, John F. Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontology-summit] [Making the Case] Barriers to adoption of ontologies, Wisnosky, Dennis E OSD DCMO |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontology-summit] [Making the Case] Barriers to adoption of ontologies, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | [ontology-summit] AUTO: Martin N Gladwell/UK/IBM is out of email contact (returning 28/02/2011), Martin N Gladwell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |