All, (01)
Just a few administrivia ... (02)
We are carrying forward all subscribers from the previous Ontology
Summit mailing list to this discussion list. If, for any reason, you
prefer not to participate this time, you may remove yourself by
sending a blank message from your subscribing email address to
<ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. The system will then verify
with you, and then unsubscribe you. Feel free to email me
(<peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>) if you run into any difficulty. (03)
By the way, if this <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> address is
already in your address book, and is labeled as "Ontology Summit 2010
discussion," kindly go to your address book and re-label it as
"Ontology Summit 2011 discussion." (04)
Thanks & regards. =ppy (05)
p.s. Todd (and All) ... In view of our open IPR policy (ref.
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid32), please
suppress any "confidentiality clause" associated with your message(s)
before posting to the mailing list. [Those who cannot get rid of that,
but can still legitimately contribute, may consider using a
non-corporate email address instead.]
-- (06)
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 2:28 PM, Todd J Schneider
<todd.schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Mary,
>
> Might I suggest you contact Steve Gross, Deloitte & Touche,
> and let him know about your paper. He's the new chair
> of the NCOIC Cyber Security IPT. I think MITRE is
> still a member of NCOIC.
>
> I don't have his e-mail address but he can be contacted
> via the following NCOIC address,
> cyber-security-chair@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Todd
> New Phone Number & Address (as of 6 December 2010)
> +1.571.250.1221 (Fixed)
> +1.703.655.8826 (Mobile)
>
> 22260 Pacific Blvd.
> Building 60, Suite 500
> Sterling, VA 20166
>
> This message contains information that may be confidential and privileged.
> Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive mail for the
> addressee), you should not use, copy or disclose to anyone this message or
> any information contained in this message.
>
> If you have received this message in error, please so advise the sender by
> reply e-mail and delete this message.
> Thank you for your cooperation. (07)
> From:
> "Parmelee, Mary C." <mparmelee@xxxxxxxxx>
> To:
> "steve.r.ray@xxxxxxxxxx" <steve.r.ray@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ontology Summit 2010
> discussion <ontology-summit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date:
> 12/08/2010 12:19 PM
> Subject:
> Re: [ontology-summit] Invitation to a brainstorming call for the 2011
> Ontology Summit
> Sent by:
> ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> Steve,
>
> Unless you consider it part of one of the existing categories listed
> below, then I suggest cybersecurity as an area that is ripe for applied
> ontologies. See my attached Ontology Architecture for Cybersecurity paper.
>
> Regards,
>
> Mary Parmelee
> Senior Artificial Intelligence Engineer
> MITRE Corporation
> www.mitre.org
> E-Mail: mparmelee@xxxxxxxxx
> Telephone: 919-841-4719
> [attachment "Parmelee_STIDS_2010.pdf" (08)
> From: ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [
> mailto:ontology-summit-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Steve Ray
> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:59 AM
> To: 'Ontology Summit'
> Subject: [ontology-summit] Invitation to a brainstorming call for the 2011
> Ontology Summit
>
> Colleagues,
> The time has come for us to finalize our plans for the 2011
> Ontology Summit. The organizing committee has identified a base theme for
> the summit, and we would now like to invite you to participate in a
> conference call on December 16th to brainstorm on refining and finalizing
> this theme. Developing details (including dial-in information) are
> available on the session page at:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2010_12_16
>
> Overall theme: Making the case for Ontology
> This summit will collect and curate a small number of perspectives and
> case studies for which we will strive to assemble ROI information
> (monetary and otherwise) as well as statements of the problem and solution
> approach, in support of providing solid material to draw upon when making
> the business case for both the application as well as the R&D investment
> in Ontology.
> Subthemes Groups of participants making the case in the following
> domains:
> Healthcare informatics and Biomedical
> Cyberphysical systems
> Cloud (massively parallel) computing
> Traditional engineering applications (civil, mechanical,
> aerospace
)
> Software engineering, knowledge engineering
> Enterprise and system architecture
> Government applications
> <please suggest any more you feel have some good examples>
>
> While the original premise was for making the case in a
> return-on-investment basis, the suggestion has been made that this
> question could also be framed in terms of making the case:
> For research investment
> For using an ontological approach compared to other technical
> approaches (i.e. on its technical, rather than business, merits)
> To the general public, to increase awareness and understanding
> From a business perspective (the original suggestion)
>
> Possible metrics include:
> Value in terms of productivity, value added, and other
> benefits
> Financial ROI
> Technical quality
> Risk
>
> Thanks in advance for your interest and involvement. I think we have a
> promising topic.
>
> - On behalf of the Ontology Summit Organizing Committee
>
> Steven R. Ray, Ph.D.
> Distinguished Research Fellow
> Carnegie Mellon University
> NASA Research Park
> Building 23 (MS 23-11)
> P.O. Box 1
> Moffett Field, CA 94305-0001
> Email: steve.r.ray@xxxxxxxxxx
> Phone: (650) 587-3780
> Cell: (202) 316-6481 (09)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2010/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2010
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ (010)
|