Genau – mit die rollstuhl und alles! Ganz gut! Ich komme nach Berlin am 13 Juin -> 29 Juin.
Tschuss!
D
On 4/10/09 10:12 AM, "MacPherson, Deborah" <dmacpherson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: MacPherson, Deborah
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 1:07 PM
To: 'John Bateman'; Deborah MacPherson
Cc: Peter Yim; Lieberman Joshua; Steve Ray; Michelle Raymond; Rex Brooks; David Coggeshall; Bob Smith
Subject: RE: pdf of Summit presentation
Hi John -
I've just been in awe over your slides http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/UpperOntologySummit/UO-Summit-Meeting_20050315/UOS--bateman_20060315.pdf from the Upper Ontology Summit, especially 6, 8, 10, 11, 18, 22 to 25.
Would be very interested in continuing the discussion on modularity, especially assisted living issues could involve the healthcare experts and our BIM thought leaders. Please provide more information.
Thanks,
Deborah
-----Original Message-----
From: John Bateman [mailto:bateman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 10, 2009 12:21 PM
To: Deborah MacPherson
Cc: Peter Yim; MacPherson, Deborah; Lieberman Joshua; Steve Ray; Michelle Raymond; Rex Brooks; David Coggeshall; Bob Smith
Subject: Re: pdf of Summit presentation
By the way Deborah: I think your overheads from the Summit are just great! All I can say is yes, yes and yes.
> The issue today is modularity.
Very nice to hear that in the ontology-and-standards discussion. We are putting together a small European standards proposal at present precisely to get an expert group together to address certain issues of modularity, methods and best practices for supporting modularity across what we term 'strongly heterogenous domains': it would be good to have your input on that. We're focusing on the Ambient Assisted Living domain as a testbed as here there is also a need to get very diverse devices, building design, user activities and requirements, etc. to be interoperable. So here your point:
> Everything seems to be working together fairly well, but Building
> Information is having interoperability problems.
> Unlike geospatial data, building data does not have a common point of origin.
is spot on. This is where we see strong heterogeneity needing to come in.
Anyway, just an immediate response,
Best,
John B.
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (01)
|