> If you don't do your homework in defining the meaning of any symbols
> at the end of that URI rainbow, it'll just be garbage.
> The GIGO principle for computer systems has not been repealed by the
> Semantic Web. (01)
Agree up to a point. No-one (except W3C...sigh...) is seriously
suggesting that the URI somehow represents the semantics of what it's
pointing to but having URIs maintained by some "authority" can at least
deal with a large part of the tedium that we see coming out of so-called
semantic web technologies, by providing a common handle for talking
about the same thing. Let someone else, or indeed anyone else, go and
create reams of web pages explaining what the thing identified actually
*is* (I've no idea what a ream of web pages would look like however). (02)
By using the same identifier for some thing, whatever different parties
might call it ("avocat" (uid:12345) is the same as "avocado"
(uid:12345), is surely a step forward from having to do painful
inferencing such as "when I use the term 'avocat' in the context of some
French text and discussion about fruit, rather than about the legal
system, it is more likely than not that I mean the same as your English
word 'avocado' rather than 'lawyer'" - we seem to love chewing up lots
of bandwidth with the latter approach, with very dubious results, rather
than - heaven forfend - accepting any authority for issuing an
identifier. (03)
Peter (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2009/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2009
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/ (05)
|