| Correction.  Second sentence should read: 
 
 	Are relations not "conceptual" in the way that "concepts" are? 
 
 Sorry 'bout that. On Apr 20, 2007, at 20:57 , Bill Andersen wrote: Pat,
 
 How come "relations" are a separate category from "concepts"?  Are relations not "conceptual" in the way that "conceptual" are?  If it is the case that 'concept' is just parlor speak for those things that we typically represent with nodes in a taxonomy or unary predicates in a logic, and if 'relation' is used to talk about those things that are not "concepts" (i.e. the things we like to represent with predicate terms of arity greater than one), then the distinction seems artificial.  Should there not be just "concepts" divided into the 1-, 2- ... n-ary cases? 
 
 	.bill On Apr 20, 2007, at 19:12 , Cassidy, Patrick J. wrote: In discussions I use: "A representation of the structure of concepts and the relations between them, in a form that a computer can reason with." 
 
 Pat 
 
 Patrick Cassidy CNTR-MITRE 260 Industrial Way West Eatontown NJ 07724 Eatontown: 732-578-6340 Cell: 908-565-4053 
 
 
   -----Original Message----- Of Peter F Brown Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 7:08 PM To: Ontology Summit 2007 Forum Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Framework Draft  StatementfortheOntology Summit 
 
 Too many too's... ;-) 
 
 But seriously, are we looking for a Gartner Group-style 4 word  
 mission  statement to make it sound good, or do we want a formulation that actually does mean something and that we can agree on?  Brevity does not always equate with clarity: if I have to choose to sacrifice one, it would be brevity. 
 
 Peter 
 
 -----Original Message-----  
 Deborah  MacPherson Sent: 20 April 2007 16:02 To: Ontology Summit 2007 Forum Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Framework Draft Statement fortheOntology Summit 
    "a formal description of terms that represent concepts and relationships in as chosen subject matter of interest"  
 
 
 is too long, too much of a mouthful of too many words. 
 
 Debbie 
   Its almost good enough... But an ontology is more than just about  
 terms.  
 
 How about: 
 
  "a formal description of terms that represent concepts and relationships in as chosen subject matter of interest" 
 
 Mike 
 
 
 
 
 
 ========================== Michael Uschold M&CT, Phantom Works 425 373-2845 ========================== 
 
 ---------------------------------------------------- COOL TIP: to skip the phone menu tree and get a human on   
 the phone, go  
 
 
 
 
 
 -----Original Message----- Sent: Friday, April 20, 2007 3:08 PM To: Ontology Summit 2007 Forum Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Framework Draft   
 Statement for  theOntology Summit 
 
 I agree: we've worked with the definition "a formal descriptions of terms and the relationships between them" [1] as being good   
 enough to  know what we talking about when we're talking about what   
 we're talking  about...and "good enough" should be good enough. 
 
 Peter 
 
 [1] From 'OASIS Reference Model for Service-Oriented Architecture',  
 p17,  see 
     
 
 
 
 -----Original Message-----  
 
 Chris  Welty Sent: 19 April 2007 20:23 To: Ontology Summit 2007 Forum Subject: Re: [ontology-summit] Ontology Framework Draft   
 Statement for  the Ontology Summit 
 
 
 
 Surely after 15 years we can do better than "specification of a conceptualization"?  Isn't it time we put that one to rest? 
 
 -Chris 
 
 Obrst, Leo J. wrote:  All, 
 
 Here is our draft statement about the Ontology Framework.   
 
 We invite  you to consider and discuss this -- now and in next   
 
 week's sessions.  We intend this to be an inclusive characterization of what an  
 
 ontology  
   is. Inclusive: meaning that we invite you to consider   
 
 where you and  your community is with respect to these dimensions. If you have concerns or issues, restatements or elaborations, please   
 
 let us know  now and next week. This will shortly be posted on the   
 
 Framework Wiki  page:  
   
 
   
 meworksFor  Consideration.  
 
 
 
 Thanks much, 
 
 Tom Gruber, Michael Gruninger, Pat Hayes, Deborah McGuinness, Leo Obrst 
 
 _____________________________________________ Dr. Leo Obrst       The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics Voice: 703-983-6770 7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305 Fax: 703-983-1379   McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
   
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------  -- 
 
 
 
 _________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Config: Community Files:  
   Community Wiki:  
 
 
 -- Dr. Christopher A. Welty                    IBM Watson   
 Research Center  +1.914.784.7055                             19 Skyline Dr. 
 
 _________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Config: Community Files:     Community Wiki: 
 
 No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.5/769 - Release Date: 19/04/2007 17:56 
 
 
 
 No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.5.5/769 - Release Date: 19/04/2007 17:56 
 
 
 
 _________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Config: Community Files:     Community Wiki: 
 
 _________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Config:    Community Files:     Community Wiki:    
   
 
 
 
 
 --  
 
 ************************************************* Deborah L. MacPherson Specifier, WDG Architecture PLLC Projects Director, Accuracy&Aesthetics 
 
 The content of this email may contain private and confidential information. Do not forward, copy, share, or otherwise distribute without explicit written permission from all correspondents. 
 
 ************************************************** 
 
 _________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Config: Community Files:    Community Wiki: 
 
 _________________________________________________________________ Subscribe/Config:  Community Files:    Community Wiki:  
   
 
 
 _________________________________________________________________  
  Chief Scientist 3600 O'Donnell Street, Suite 600 Baltimore, MD 21224 Office: 410-675-1201 Cell: 443-858-6444    
 
 _________________________________________________________________    |  
 
_________________________________________________________________
Msg Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-summit/ 
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-summit/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontology-summit-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Community Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologySummit2007/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologySummit2007
Community Portal: http://ontolog.cim3.net/    (01)
 
 |