To: | ontology-based-standards <ontology-based-standards@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Alex Shkotin <alex.shkotin@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:53:49 +0400 |
Message-id: | <CAFxxROTjOXxS4E1bA0XRXoa+wS1OimcM53W7F2D+yHuPmnxJpA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Simon, I think it's just more simple: Torsen gave us elements of hydrology theory (formal one;-) abstracted from bio-objects.
Suppose this theory can predict flood movement and other hydrology processes. But where crocodiles? They are neglected. Abstraction.
They do not impact to hydrological processes of interest. Do they? Ask hydrologists:-)
I think they have an amendment to the coefficient of viscosity of the water in this case;-) Alex 2013/10/18 <Simon.Cox@xxxxxxxx> Re the discussion about water/crocodiles/water bodies etc: _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontology-based-standards/ Subscribe: mailto:ontology-based-standards-join@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Config/Unsubscribe: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontology-based-standards/ Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/work/OntologyBasedStandards/ Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologyBasedStandards (01) |