Just the published patents take up about a TB of space at
the USPTO, so stacking up about seven or eight of those FMF units could be
partitioned by vocabulary perhaps. But the search parts would then have
to be over the entire vocabulary and any unit that has a partial match with the
patent vocabularies.
What would the total cost of ownership (TCO) be like to
set up a project with the FMF performing the needed functionalities, plus a few
dbmss?
Sincerely,
Rich
Cooper,
Rich Cooper,
Chief Technology Officer,
MetaSemantics Corporation
MetaSemantics AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
( 9 4 9 ) 5 2 5-5 7 1 2
http://www.EnglishLogicKernel.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John F Sowa
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 12:53 PM
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Architecture of Intelligent Systems - Flexible
Modular Framework
Rich,
First a correction. In the following I meant to say
14 gigabytes, not 14 terabytes. It actually did a significant amount of
processing.
> As for performance, the space overhead for one agent
is about 1K bytes
> (plus whatever space the application uses). In
one test, the FMF used
> thousands of agents to process 14 gigabytes of data
on a machine with
> 8 CPUs in 15 minutes. When 7 CPUs were turned
off, it took almost
> 2 hours. That's almost linear scaling.
(The data was provided by the
> client, and the VivoMind system generated better
results in less time
> than the previous software that the client had been
using.)
JFS
> However, most AI systems for NLP and informal
reasoning make do with
> any data they get.
RC
> Agreed - there are many data wrangling tools.
Embedding one or more
> dbmss makes great sense also, even very local dbmss
that are only
> shared among a LAN's users for security reasons.
Yes, our clients are professionals who know how to handle
large volumes of data with all the required locking, etc. What they need
are methods for processing and interpreting large volumes. They don't
need or want the system to update the old data.
John
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community
Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J