|From:||Erick Antezana <erick.antezana@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:06:45 +0100|
I feel a bit guilty of having started this thread with such a "controversial" question about the "grey line" (if any) between ontologies and master data. Anyway, the view I had before this thread actually coincided exactly with Thomas Johnston's which I used to translated into a language that some managers could digest so that my projects could get budgeted... I still share the same thinking as Thomas with some adjustments as Matthew elaborated (e.g. ontologies can hold types/kinds + instances; although I prefer to call those things: knowledgebases or application ontologies depending on the listener...) as well as the notion of having a continuum between both artefacts (i.e. ontologies and MD).
I totally agree with Kingsley and John about loosing focus while discussing about (buzz)words meanings; nevertheless, I believe that Matthew could still illuminate us by elaborating his position...
On 18 February 2015 at 15:27, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 2/17/15 9:29 PM, Thomas Johnston wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, Kingsley Idehen|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, John F Sowa|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, Kingsley Idehen|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, Thomas Johnston|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|