|From:||Steven Ericsson-Zenith <steven@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 16 Feb 2015 16:38:32 -0800|
Forgive me, it is not clear to me exactly what you mean by "self-consistent" what is such consistency and what is it that assures it? I have built a number of SQL databases in my past (I used to work for Oracle), mostly from schemas of my design, but admit this is not something that I have done in awhile (and I tend to use XMLDB and technologies for my current work).
I am also confused about "Master Data Metadata," I do recall Master Data Management that refers to slow changing data - enterprise reference, standards, policies etc... Is this the same thing or different? As you are using the term Ontology in the IT context, it seems that you are referring to product warehouse inventory/data or some such. Correct?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Ravi Sharma <drravisharma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, John Bottoms|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, Thomas Johnston|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, Ravi Sharma|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] master data vs. ontologies, Thomas Johnston|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|