Ali, Rob, et al, (01)
I have come across some views that intentionality is difficult or
impossible to implement.
There appear to be a number of candidate reasons including lack of
consensus, issues with dualism, ambiguity of language or implementation
using FOL. (02)
So, the question is: Are there any examples or guidelines for
implementing, or best practices for intentionality?
Else, are we reduced to using a human as the per-processor for current
implementations? (03)
(This topic was touched on in the thread "Can Syntax become Semantic ?"
but that was not the focus of the discussion.) (04)
-John Bottoms
Concord, MA USA (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (06)
|