On 6/18/13 10:23 PM, John F Sowa wrote:
> KI
>> >But how so you put Aristotle into a Web resource such that user agents
>> >can then make sense of what they encounter?
> You can use Aristotle's subset of logic in exactly the same way that you
> would use OWL or any other DL. It is the most widely used subset of any
> of them. But it is very easy to learn, and it can be written in just
> four simple sentence patterns in English or any other language.
There was a horrible typo in my initial post, I meant to ask: (01)
How do you put Aristotle's semantics into a structured document that's
web-like, and optionally scalable to the World Wide Web? Goal being that
document content's structure bears enough semantic fidelity for programs
and humans to understand and exploit. (02)
-- (03)
Regards, (04)
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen (05)
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)
|