| To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
|---|---|
| Cc: | Rich Cooper <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
| From: | Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx> | 
| Date: | Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:17:55 -0500 | 
| Message-id: | <CADE8KM4qAbwsLFj4-rUhsChT_1a=wJpn__-EBBsSJheC4LLSQA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx> wrote:
 I provide absolutely no evidence for this claim.  
More to the point, neither did Benjamin Lee Whorf, "Connecticut fire prevention inspector and weekend language-fancier" , who wrote the quoted material.  
I merely posted a one line link to the relevant section of the  SEP article on Philosophy of Linguistics, which does a fairly good job of showing that "the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis" isn't even a hypothesis.  
Simon _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01)  | 
| Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, Pat Hayes | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, Rich Cooper | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, Pat Hayes | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis, Rich Cooper | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |