[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Architectural considerations in Ontology Development

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Hans Polzer" <hpolzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:36:38 -0500
Message-id: <011b01ce0d78$658ba410$30a2ec30$@verizon.net>
Sorry, Duane. I don't have a link. It was a verbal comment made by a Swedish
Defense Ministry person during a meeting on interoperability that I attended
in Stockholm in the 2005 timeframe. I'd be surprised  if this was publicly
acknowledged at the time they were following the policy.    (01)

Hans    (02)

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Duane Nickull
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 11:47 PM
To: [ontolog-forum]; 'deddy'
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Architectural considerations in Ontology
Development    (03)

On 2013-02-16 4:23 PM, "Hans Polzer" <hpolzer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    (04)

>This reminds me of the fact that during the Cold War the Swedish 
>military deliberately made their systems non-interoperable with those 
>of other countries (like NATO nations) because they didn't want any 
>invading troops to be able to use any equipment they might capture.
Being of Swedish descent, I was not aware of this.  Is there a link?  I know
the Americans used the Navajo language for cryptographic constructs.
Was not aware of this.    (05)

Duane    (06)

Technoracle Advanced Systems Inc.
Consulting and Contracting; Proven Results!
i.  Neo4J, PDF, Java, LiveCycle ES, Flex, AIR, CQ5 & Mobile b.
http://technoracle.blogspot.com t.  @duanenickull Whis.pr - http://whis.pr    (07)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (08)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>