ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Architectural considerations in Ontology Development

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 'deddy' <deddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Duane Nickull <duane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 20:46:59 -0800
Message-id: <CD45A07B.27110B%duane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 2013-02-16 4:23 PM, "Hans Polzer" <hpolzer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    (01)


>This reminds me of the fact that during the Cold War the Swedish military
>deliberately made their systems non-interoperable with those of other
>countries (like NATO nations) because they didn't want any invading
>troops to be able to use any equipment they might capture.
Being of Swedish descent, I was not aware of this.  Is there a link?  I
know the Americans used the Navajo language for cryptographic constructs.
Was not aware of this.    (02)

Duane    (03)

***********************************
Technoracle Advanced Systems Inc.
Consulting and Contracting; Proven Results!
i.  Neo4J, PDF, Java, LiveCycle ES, Flex, AIR, CQ5 & Mobile
b. http://technoracle.blogspot.com
t.  @duanenickull
Whis.pr ­ http://whis.pr    (04)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>