Re: [ontolog-forum] FW: Big Data Logic Stack?

[Ronald Stamper <stamper.measur@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Sjir,

I recall, long long ago an early presentation of NIAM in Munich when I pointed this out.

I hope my memory is correct because ever since I have preserved an affection for you methods.

Kind regards,

Ronald

On 2 Feb 2013, at 16:26, Sjir Nijssen wrote:

Hi William,

 

Indeed the distinction between the world of the objects (entities, things) and the world of the names (references, labels) for the things as well as their connection is a fundamental aspect of conceptual modeling as defined in ISO TR9007 (1987).

In one part of ISO TR9007 there is the distinction between NOLOTs (Non Lexical Object Types) and LOTs (Lexical Object types) and their connection.

 

Regards

 

Sjir Nijssen

 

Chief Technical Officer

PNA Group

 

Tel:        +31 (0)88-777 0 444

Mob:      +31 (0)6-21 510 844

Fax:       +31 (0)88-777 0 499

E-mail:    sjir.nijssen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-------------------------------------------------------

http://www.pna-group.com

---

Van: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] namens William Frank [williamf.frank@xxxxxxxxx]
Verzonden: zaterdag 2 februari 2013 17:11
To: [ontolog-forum]
Onderwerp: Re: [ontolog-forum] FW: Big Data Logic Stack?

On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 10:43 AM, John F Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If you change terminology fast enough, you get an illusion of progress.

John

And THIS is one of my own favorite observations.  Not quite on topic, but I can't resist:  

A technology manager, charged in 1999 with replacing a global system where replacement projects had repeatedly failed, changed the NAME of the system,  changed all the documentation and the code that mentioned the name to the new name, (did also buy new machines compatable with the old),and declared victory.  This project was accomplished in less than a year, and for only about $XXMM.   I thought, welcome to the 21st century.  This person is now CTO of that enterprise.  

Beyond the fact that we ontologists focus on logical implication, rather than equally important conversational implicature, there is **the entire world** of the sociology and psychology of language, which is where I would venture at least 80% of the purpose of the things people say lies.   While we are saying, the name is not important, it is the concept behind the name we are after, and yet, as is often reported in these exchanges, are arguing about the names all the time.  People have many many reasons to resist the goals of a 'singularity" I think Hans's point, contra to Kingsley's, lies here.   
 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J

-- 
William Frank

413/376-8167

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)