Re: [ontolog-forum] UML and Semantics

[David Eddy <deddy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

John -

On Dec 5, 2012, at 10:29 AM, John F Sowa wrote:

TQA was called "natural language", but I would call it a CNL, since
it was completely specified by a formal grammar and a mapping to
first-order logic.  The users loved it, but it required a PhD linguist
at IBM Yorktown to update and extend the ontology.

Sounds eminently practical (NOT!).

How long did the PhD tolerate this task?

After the PhD linguist moved on to more interesting tasks, how long did TQA survive?

- David

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)