ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Social interaction and teamwork

To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Len Yabloko" <lenyabloko@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 22:25:37 -0400
Message-id: <929760.97096.bm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Len Yabloko

'Per aspera ad astra'

----- Reply message -----
From: "Rich Cooper" <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <edbark@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ontolog-forum] Social interaction and teamwork
Date: Fri, Jun 15, 2012 7:36 pm


Rich and Paul,
I see nothing paradoxical in this play on words. Yes, it can be considered funny or witty for about five seconds. But quite frankly it has nothing to do with wit, being a couple of thousands years old joke. Well, some a still loughing. As my favorite comedian Victor Borge used to say " ... This is your language, I am just trying to use it"

But we can all agree there are no statements
agreed by everyone, right?

Regards,
--Paul

If we all did agree to a statement, then that
agreement would have been agreed by everyone, thus
contradicting the many subjective models we each
had previously mentally formed in reaching said
agreement simultaneously.  So then none of us
would agree to the first such, statement.  The
elegance of that thought is magnificent.  

Great paradox, Paul, and great wit!

Sincerely,
Rich Cooper
EnglishLogicKernel.com
Rich AT EnglishLogicKernel DOT com
9 4 9 \ 5 2 5 - 5 7 1 2

-----Original Message-----
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Paul Tyson
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 3:29 PM
To: edbark@xxxxxxxx; [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Social interaction
and teamwork

On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 11:29 -0400, Ed Barkmeyer
wrote:
> 
> William Frank wrote:

> Now, IMO, this discussion is leaping back and
forth among logic, 
> epistemology, metaphysics and political/social
science, which makes it 
> very difficult to determine any relationship
between the statements of 
> various contributors.
> 

But we can all agree there are no statements
agreed by everyone, right?

Regards,
--Paul

 
__________________________________________________
_______________
Message Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-f
orum/  
Unsubscribe:
mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePa
ge#nid1J
 

 
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
 

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>