To: | cmenzel@xxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 24 May 2012 16:23:54 -0400 |
Message-id: | <CADE8KM66f9ydES9yw0npXSDL_ZPL_7RzjpZHwua6YyP0V1KcFg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Adrian, Absolutely (well Relatively). I do think that there must be a rather restricted interpretation of know(n) as well; otherwise to be countable the domain will probably have to be too restricted to be be useful. One would not want
(know-fact (that (natural-number 0)))to entail that an infinite number of facts are known. This might be two facts. But we could add the knowledge that nothing else is a natural number, merge the two clauses into a single formula yet have only one fact. (know-fact (that (forall ?n
(iff (or (= ?n 0) (and (= ?n (S ?n1))
(know-fact (that (natural-number ?n1)))))
(know-fact (that (natural-number ?n)))))) Now, it a possible rule that might make sense would be to only count as a known fact ground formula which have been directly asserted by a True Believer™, or which have been generated and cached in some fixed form as a result of answering some question (or pre-computed,etc) .
So if we have an inference engine with memoization and backward chaining, asking: (natural-number (S (S (S 0)))) might cause us to know 5 facts.
I really don't like this solution. Simon _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, Ed Barkmeyer |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, Patrick Cassidy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, Christopher Menzel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, Obrst, Leo J. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |