To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Simon Spero <sesuncedu@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 23 May 2012 12:20:39 -0400 |
Message-id: | <CADE8KM5-5YdO4MzsYNXF13aoZPoDQ6o0Q3CH9xa8bcqA8UURnQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh come on; you are just taking number and known, and unknowable for granted :-P I'm not sure that the original question is answerable without understanding more about the context in which the questioner asked it, and what kind of answer he was expecting.
I think that Leo's citation of the total amounts of bytes stored a few years ago may have come closest to a plausible interpretation- using a little Grice lets one slide by on the assumption that some very approximate finite number was wanted (and not zero or Aleph_n).
However, even there he was hesitant to suggest how that might relate to the questioners meaning of fact, since if data were meant, its fair to assume that the questioner would have used that term.
It may be possible to guess at the relationship between stored data and stored information (though most of the reports on the subject are commissioned by companies that sell storage, and for some reason don't distinguish).
The response of the in-house epistemologist to the question was "I don't know." Followed by "it depends". A proprietary response might be: (define gaf-count () (clet ((count 0))
(do-assertions (assertion) (pif (cand (asserted-assertion? assertion)
(gaf-cnf? (assertion-cnf assertion)))
(csetq count (+ count 1))))
(ret count))) Simon
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, John Bottoms |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, Matthew West |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] [ontology-summit] Estimating number of all known facts, Pat Hayes |
Next by Thread: | [ontolog-forum] Sepublica (ESWC workshop), Robert Stevens, Keynote, Alexander Garcia Castro |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |