To: | cmenzel@xxxxxxxx, "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2012 15:04:49 -0400 |
Message-id: | <CABbsESdSuPyBbY2uw8-_2R06zzDM_P--_TYbtqxnxMWetqtNFw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi Chris, You wrote The validity (equivalently, consistency) problem for classical propositional logic is already NP-complete. Sure, 3-SAT etc. But the implicit baseline here is roughly speaking SQL, or Horn-Clause+NAF. Now replace that with *classical* negation plus a 2nd order clause to simulate NAF. I'm guessing the computational complexity increases. Cheers, -- Adrian Internet Business Logic A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English Q/A over SQL and RDF Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free, and there are no advertisements Adrian Walker Reengineering On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Christopher Menzel |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Fwd: [protege-releases] Protege 3.5 Alpha, Peter Yim |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Christopher Menzel |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, John F. Sowa |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |