To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Christopher Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 23 Mar 2012 19:37:45 +0100 |
Message-id: | <CAO_JD6MqmcQ9JdCTQV5T4MORNrabMV4N0Q72TmwvrHKsmsa3Vg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi John, The validity (equivalently, consistency) problem for classical propositional logic is already NP-complete. The problem for first-order logic is only semi-computable; the problem for second-order logic is completely uncomputable. I do believe though that, typically, the addition of non-monotonic rules adds complexity, as they often involve consistency checking and hence bring with them at least the complexity of the corresponding consistency problem. (I'm no kind of expert on this topic.) -chris _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Adrian Walker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Adrian Walker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Adrian Walker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Adrian Walker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |