I thought this post from Frank Carvalho was interesting as an
application of ontologies to keep dynamic data and metadata organized. (01)
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2011Sep/0167.html (02)
It's only RDF, but I find it interesting that a standard SOA ontology
is described as a problem. Instead each "type of metainformation has
its own ontology". (03)
Are standard/upper ontologies only practical for more expressive
ontology languages? (04)
Is this a unique domain-ontology that simply wouldn't benefit from a
standard/upper ontology? (05)
--
Bart Gajderowicz, MSc.
Ryerson University
http://www.scs.ryerson.ca/~bgajdero (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (07)
|