Rich and All, (01)
On 8/11/11, Rich Cooper <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> ...[snip]...
> There seem to be many who agree the topic isn't
> part of our focus, yet also many who want to
> continue it. I am stumped about how to proceed
> given the strength of these two opposing self
> interests. -Rich Cooper (02)
[ppy] ... moving the conversation elsewhere changes the context and
creates a different conversation. I'd therefore, suggest you/we
continue here, but try our best to keep it relevant, and keep the s/n
ratio high (as this community always has.) The acid test, I guess,
which applies to whether one is starting a thread or making another
post, is to check whether that act is indeed advancing the community's
charter (http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nidB )
... And, when it gets really exciting, let each of us try to keep the
traffic volume reasonable too ... (in that regard, John Sowa's earlier
suggestion of one-message-a-day may be a useful guideline.) (03)
Thanks & regards. =ppy (04)
Peter Yim
Co-convener, ONTOLOG
-- (05)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J (06)
|