|From:||Simon Spero <ses@xxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Mon, 18 Oct 2010 21:58:39 -0400|
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:52 PM, John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:|
Ian, Rich, Pavithra, Adrian, Chris M, Ed, Chris P, and Ali,
I was reading the CL spec in the bath this morning, and I'm pretty sure that it marks the XML notation (XCL) as being the preferred/recommended concrete syntax.
ISO/IEC 24707:2007(E), P 23 Annex A [CLIF], Section A.1:
[...] The Recommended Common Logic interchange notation is based on XML, a stanard which was not available when KIF was originally designed.
ISO/IEC 24707:2007(E), P 54 Annex C [XCL], Section C.1:
"XCL is an XML notation for Common Logic. It is the intended interchange language for communication Common Logic across a network".
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Oooh, FOL is too hard to learn., John F. Sowa|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Oooh, FOL is too hard to learn., John F. Sowa|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Oooh, FOL is too hard to learn., Ed Barkmeyer|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Oooh, FOL is too hard to learn., John F. Sowa|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|