|From:||Adrian Walker <adriandwalker@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:30:43 -0500|
Hi John, |
The worst possible solution is to define a syntactic interchange
method for systems whose semantics were independently defined.
Unless and until somebody has proved that the semantic foundations
are identical, one must assume that they are incompatible.
I'd like to point out  that this is also a key issue for the Rule Interchange Format (RIF) work at W3C.
Cheers, -- Adrian
Internet Business Logic
A Wiki and SOA Endpoint for Executable Open Vocabulary English over SQL and RDF
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com Shared use is free
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:36 PM, John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontologist Aptitude Test? - measuring ontologies, Chris Partridge|
|Previous by Thread:|
|Next by Thread:|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|