Thanks John (01)
> By the way, I have not studied Wolfram's work in full detail, and I don't
>want to defend or explain everything he's doing. But I do want to point out
>that he wasn't making the mistake of claiming that the real world is as
>simple as a digital automaton. (02)
Of course not.Thanks for pointing that out. But some passages in the
lecture seem create the impression that physical world results from a
certain kind of computation, while obviously that's a cognitive
representation. So many things he discusses are related to various
arguments on this and other fora. I hope he will give other lectures,
and will try to read more from him (03)
> (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|