|
Duane
I agree that there are many different
contexts
which may apply to the same reality.
There may be N different contexts corresponding
to
the ways that N different people view the
same reality.
Further, one person may have M different
contexts
which correspond to M different
purposes.
My definition of a proposition is context +
sentence.
A person creates a proposition by choosing a
context,
then a sentence.
This may cause a communication problem
if a second person does not know, or chooses to ignore,
the context of the person who created the proposition.
It's not "isu" and "iss" that are
changing,
It's the context/hierarchy that is
changing.
There are N times M
contexts/hierarchies
for the single reality that you are thinking
about.
Dick McCullough Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done; mKE do enhance od Real
Intelligence done; knowledge := man do identify od existent
done; knowledge haspart proposition list; http://mKRmKE.org/
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 3:41
PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP
Ontology projects
I am not sure I think of it that way, although it
interests me. IMO, context in a n..*-dimensional matrix whereby
intersecting context details may or may not be visible to each aspect of a
preposition. For example, one person, in a certain context, may deem me
Duane Nickull even if I am dead where to others such would be false.
As such, ontological research must IMO embrace this dichotomy
with more of a quantum computing approach than the limited binary vision of
the world. ?Isu: seems based on simplistic predicate calculus.
I can both be and not be Duane Nickull to two different observers.
Likewise I may be Duane Nickull to both or them or neither of them.
If I am dead, the government may no longer consider me to exist as Duane
Nickull whereby my family may eternally believe I exist in spirit.
Not
to disagree, but I think the complete aspect of context is much more complex
than can be represented in a hierarchy.
Duane
On 01/03/09
12:36 PM, "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I have defined "context" to be a list of
propositions.
But the propositions may refer to the
hierarchy.
Here is a list of propositions
Dick McCullough isu
person;
Duane Nickull isu
person;
person iss entity;
which is the same as this
hierarchy
begin hierarchy
people;
entity;
/
person;
//
i:Dick
McCullough;
//
i:Duane
Nickull;
end hierarchy people;
Dick McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od
mKR done;
mKE do enhance od Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man
do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://mKRmKE.org/
----- Original Message -----
From: Duane Nickull <mailto:dnickull@xxxxxxxxx>
To: [ontolog-forum] <mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
; Richard H. McCullough <mailto:rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> ;
Azamat <mailto:abdoul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: SW-forum <mailto:semantic-web@xxxxxx>
; KR-language <mailto:KR-language@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 12:06
PM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] EU FP
Ontology projects
Richard:
Do you see
?Context? strictly as a hierarchic node? I see it more of an
omnipotent concept covering all other concepts. Would not a
relation and action have contextual impact on the actual
pragmatics?
Duane
On 01/03/09 11:59 AM, "Richard
H. McCullough" <rhm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Azamat said
I wonder how
can it cover many different views with such
a narrow
reading of relationship, knowledge, and context?
I
neglected to make a very important point.
This
entity-characteristic-proposition hierarchy
begin
hierarchy tabula
rasa;
existent;
/
entity; # physical Entity
/
group; # abstract
Entity
/ characteristic;
# property
//
attribute;
//
part;
///
context;
///
sentence;
//
relation;
//
action;
//
interaction;
/
proposition;
sentence;
/
statement;
/
question;
/
command;
/
assignment;
/
production;
/
conditional;
/
iteration;
/
quantification;
end hierarchy tabula
rasa;
is my preferred hierarchy.
But the
mKR/mKE system can dynamically
transform tabula rasa into
another hierarchy
by concept integration and
differentiation,
or it can use your favorite hierarchy
instead.
Dick
McCullough
Ayn Rand do speak od mKR done;
mKE do enhance od
Real Intelligence done;
knowledge := man do identify od
existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
http://mKRmKE.org/
--
**********************************************************************
Duane
Nickull, Vancouver, BC Canada
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe
LiveCycle ES and Enterprise
Duane's World TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/#pg+1537
Blog
- http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Twitter
- http://twitter.com/duanechaos
Community
Open Source Music - http://www.mixmatchmusic.com
My
Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
**********************************************************************
--
**********************************************************************
Duane
Nickull, Vancouver, BC Canada
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe LiveCycle
ES and Enterprise
Duane's World TV Show - http://tv.adobe.com/#pg+1537
Blog -
http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Twitter
- http://twitter.com/duanechaos
Community
Open Source Music - http://www.mixmatchmusic.com
My
Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
**********************************************************************
|