To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Ali Hashemi <ali.hashemi+ontolog@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Feb 2009 18:40:46 -0500 |
Message-id: | <5ab1dc970902171540of53408ak8fba11e41e9d3da7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi David, I've been interested in a while as well, and as Anders suggested, debate ontologies have come under the guise of argumentation. As far as i know, there are two efforts along this vein, with only one actually developing an explicit ontology - "Argument Interchange Format" available here:
and here are some papers on it: the other is Argument Markup Language (AML), more info on that here:
I'm not sure how active either of those two projects are. I've been developing my own over the past year, though not complete enough to share :P.
In terms of debates, there's a fairly well developed, though implicit / informal ontology to be found on "debate graphs" Hope this helps, Ali On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Anders W.Tell <opensource@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: One idea may be to look for argumentation and/or in the area of software -- (•`'·.¸(`'·.¸(•)¸.·'´)¸.·'´•) .,., _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ontolog-forum] Finally, a lawyer with a heart, Jack Ring |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] standard ontology, Patrick Cassidy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontologies for Debate?, Anders W.Tell |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontologies for Debate?, Anders W.Tell |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |