[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Ontologies for Debate?

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Pat Hayes <phayes@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:57:51 -0600
Message-id: <108E8BE5-48DE-49CD-98A1-92392D17E8CC@xxxxxxx>

On Feb 18, 2009, at 1:58 AM, Anders W.Tell wrote:

Ali Hashemi wrote:
In terms of debates, there's a fairly well developed, though implicit / informal ontology to be found on "debate graphs"

The third entry and debategraph and its argumentation may very well interest the participants on this list :)

"Can Computers Think?
A long term project with AI theorists and philosophers to bring Robert Horn's brilliant and pioneering debate map of 50 years of philosophical argument about the Turing Test and the possibility of computer thought up to date"

Its fairly well known. It is also, now, woefully out of date. Still, it makes for a very entertaining trot through the main issues in what might be called the philosophy of cognitive science. 

Pat Hayes

IHMC                                     (850)434 8903 or (650)494 3973   
40 South Alcaniz St.           (850)202 4416   office
Pensacola                            (850)202 4440   fax
FL 32502                              (850)291 0667   mobile
phayesAT-SIGNihmc.us       http://www.ihmc.us/users/phayes

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Config Subscr: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To join: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?WikiHomePage#nid1J
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>