|From:||"Александр Шкотин" <alex.shkotin@xxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:47:29 +0400|
sorry I did not check this (Wittgenstein) thread before, for me
Wittgenstein = (Frege+Russell)/2
exactly - there are sciences for every area you mentioned and it would be not easy to formalize their terms (concepts, ideas).
"psychology and sociology" are sciences...
these are another stories:
- often it is important only a meaning of word usage, i.e. here and now. we usually use words for messaging and interaction (to achieve a goal not a truth).
- but if you need the exact meaning of the word of a concrete person - you need just too much information about him. and there is a reasonable question: why?
sometimes for your relatives you have this information gratis and really understand them as nobody else;)
PS "In any ontology is as much truth as mathematics" I. Kant (Joke)
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, John F. Sowa|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, FERENC KOVACS|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, John F. Sowa|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, Len Yabloko|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|