To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Александр Шкотин" <alex.shkotin@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 8 Aug 2008 18:47:29 +0400 |
Message-id: | <b24945a10808080747q515a1fe9l6748d5cce81b2c3f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
John,
sorry I did not check this (Wittgenstein) thread before, for me Wittgenstein = (Frege+Russell)/2 (Joke)
JS:
AS: exactly - there are sciences for every area you mentioned and it would be not easy to formalize their terms (concepts, ideas).
JS:
AS: "psychology and sociology" are sciences... JS:
AS: these are another stories: - often it is important only a meaning of word usage, i.e. here and now. we usually use words for messaging and interaction (to achieve a goal not a truth).
- but if you need the exact meaning of the word of a concrete person - you need just too much information about him. and there is a reasonable question: why? sometimes for your relatives you have this information gratis and really understand them as nobody else;)
PS "In any ontology is as much truth as mathematics" I. Kant (Joke) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, John F. Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, FERENC KOVACS |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, Len Yabloko |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |