|From:||FERENC KOVACS <f.kovacs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>|
|Date:||Wed, 30 Jul 2008 01:11:19 +0000 (GMT)|
It is not just that. By teaching children to think (to see how concepts are formulated by their own brains, using reflective thinking and disciplined logic, reflective inquiry (Dewey's terms)), starting from their current achievement and not to follow the presentation of knowledge as organised by adult logic of this century, missing out all the details of how we got here we can have a) a common access to knowledge representations redesigned, b) to the recorded progress of individual learners who can follow whatever thread they need to in that master structure or template of knowledge reps.
I do not understand why in the US people want to augment intellect by making gadgets only and not try to make children more inteligent by education them in a different way using computers again in a radically different way (mirroring the mind, both collectvey and individually ).Children get lost and frustrated because some kids can think fast and forward ohers cannot and that is the basic cultural difference due to teaching them lexical knowledge and no informal logic, reflective thinking. teaching Critical thnkinking s abut taking a moral stand and to become good at disputes.
Thank you for your comment Ravi
----- Original Message ----
From: "Sharma, Ravi" <Ravi.Sharma@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: [ontolog-forum] <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, 30 July, 2008 12:10:53 AM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures
This is closer to how I think we understand if we are not too dependant on text only for all learning, especially phenomena and processes. If these can be taught on similar lines, our youth might become interested in more and more non-book learning.
(Dr. Ravi Sharma) Senior Enterprise Architect
Vangent, Inc. Technology Excellence Center (TEC)
8618 Westwood Center Drive, Suite 310, Vienna VA 22182
Professional viewpoints do not necessarily imply organizational endorsement.
From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of FERENC KOVACS
To supplement my comment with citation from authorities
Translation from Hungarian of Tractatus:
2.1 We create images of facts
2.12 An image is a model of reality.
2.13 Objects in a picture correspond to the components of a picture.
2.14.1 A picture is a fact
2.182 All pictures are of logic at the same time
3. The logical picture of facts is an idea
+44 77 70654068 (Vodafone)
I have moved to:
5 St Mary's Place
Mobile in Hungary: +36 70 5766786 Vodafone
Until 1st August 2008 also available on +36 87 480 080
_________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|<Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread>|
|Previous by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] meaning and core ontologies, FERENC KOVACS|
|Next by Date:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, Gerry Creager|
|Previous by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, Christopher Menzel|
|Next by Thread:||Re: [ontolog-forum] Wittgenstein and the pictures, Gerry Creager|
|Indexes:||[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]|