To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Neil Custer" <neil.custer@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 22 May 2008 09:13:44 -0500 |
Message-id: | <7a5bda850805220713o5b0e11das261e3b19cec8c939@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
John, re: Any such classification oversimplifies too much. Unfortunately, in consideration of some of the people I need to educate on the value of ontology engineering, there is no such thing as "oversimplification". Generalizations are a good thing, just like top-level ontologies. They help give some common "frame of reference" to work with, even if those I'm sharing with don't understand half of the concepts the way that I do. Having said that, I've much catching up to do, but I'm motivated. I'm finding your "Mathematical Background" material good reading. That should tell you something. -- Neil <mantra deleted> _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Data Models v. Ontologies (again), John F. Sowa |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Data Models v. Ontologies (again), Ed Barkmeyer |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Data Models v. Ontologies (again), John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Data Models v. Ontologies (again), Ed Barkmeyer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |