Interesting thought, Cory. Might apply this approach to a problem such
as the one described here ? (01)
http://semanticweb.mitre.org/wmsl/ (02)
Cory Casanave wrote:
> Abduction can be particularly powerful when combined with interactive
> reasoning processes that involve one or more human actors (as well as
> automated actors) in the process. Such reasoning is not expected to be
> infallible, and the assumption of infallibility is limiting for many
> classes of problems.
> For example, most automated systems, service and process integration
> can't be 100% reliable based on the level of semantics available - so it
> is difficult to trust reasoning systems for this job. However,
> reasoning systems can suggest highly useful mappings and correlations
> that make integration more practical and effective. With the "human in
> the loop" and normal validation procedures such "suggestions" may become
> trustworthy.
> -Cory Casanave
> (03)
--
Thanks Rick,
blog http://spout.rickmurphy.org
web http://www.rickmurphy.org
cell 703-201-9129 (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|