I look forward to be reading the replies that you get on this thread.
A quick search reveals
that there must be a few theories out already, and I would like to see
them organized into an
interconnecting tree, as many have overlapping leaves, although coming
from different branches.
Maybe with your method of querying randomness, you can work out an
exact approximation of how many theories there are and how they relate
to each other... (02)
However I would like to understand a bit more of what you mean by:'
misuse implies definitive use'. Please state explicitly your
underlying axiom. (hints to pragmatism de rigour on this list) (03)
Paola DM (04)
On 2/11/08, Rob Freeman <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the "Axiomatic ontology" thread you accused me of the "misuse" of
> words. Since "misuse" (to my mind) implies definitive use, I would
> like to invite you to present your theory of definitive word meaning.
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Paola Di Maio
School of IT
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)