Or my uncles work on the subject: (01)
http://www.nickull.net/darkenergy.html (02)
/d (03)
On 1/15/08 10:26 AM, "Randall R Schulz" <rschulz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: (04)
> (*) Presumably we must hold open the possibility that the phenomena
> known colloquially as "dark matter" and "dark energy" (owing to our
> near-total ignorance of what underpins the observations to which those
> terms are attached) might involve new physics that is outside what we
> now think of as QM. The simplicity and continuity of GR makes it seem
> less likely that it needs elaboration, but presumably that's a personal
> bias of mine (quite probably shared by Einstein during his life, as
> well). (05)
--
**********************************************************************
"Speaking only for myself"
Senior Technical Evangelist - Adobe Systems, Inc.
Blog - http://technoracle.blogspot.com
Community Music - http://www.mix2r.com
My Band - http://www.myspace.com/22ndcentury
Adobe MAX 2008 - http://technoracle.blogspot.com/2007/08/adobe-max-2008.html
********************************************************************** (06)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (07)
|