On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, John F. Sowa wrote:
> PH> Exactly. One would use multiple ontologies, rather than a
> > special logic, to represent the complexities of the various kinds
> > of context.
> In that case, we seem to be fairly close. What you have suggested
> is essentially what I was planning to do to map CG boxes to IKL.
> But Chris seemed to indicate that his position was quite a bit
> different from what I had intended. (01)
I'm not sure what I said to suggest that, but my views on this issue
coincide closely with with Pat's. Indeed, I was going to give exactly
the IKL translation of your example of multiple modalities that Pat
gave, but he beat me to the punch. (02)
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (04)