[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] CL, CG, IKL and the relationship between symbols in

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Chris Menzel <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 22:48:45 -0600 (CST)
Message-id: <alpine.OSX.1.00.0801012242390.16396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Tue, 1 Jan 2008, John F. Sowa wrote:
> ...
> PH> Exactly. One would use multiple ontologies, rather than a
> > special logic, to represent the complexities of the various kinds
> > of context.
> In that case, we seem to be fairly close.  What you have suggested
> is essentially what I was planning to do to map CG boxes to IKL.
> But Chris seemed to indicate that his position was quite a bit
> different from what I had intended.    (01)

I'm not sure what I said to suggest that, but my views on this issue
coincide closely with with Pat's.  Indeed, I was going to give exactly
the IKL translation of your example of multiple modalities that Pat
gave, but he beat me to the punch.    (02)

-chris    (03)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (04)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>