To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Deborah MacPherson" <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:46:23 -0400 |
Message-id: | <48f213f30708281046o55559c7et8db7d6b62fd0264b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Hi Paola, Please see the message below forwarded from Ravinder Thakur on Linking-open-data at MIT. Will his problem be addressed in the framework? Does anyone have suggestions for Mr. Thakur and his collaborators at linking open data? Thank you, Deborah Deborah L. MacPherson Projects Director, Accuracy&Aesthetics Specifier, WDG Architecture PLLC ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Ravinder Thakur" < ravinderthakur@xxxxxxxxx> To: "Linking Open Data" <linking-open-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 22:18:09 -0700 Subject: [Linking-open-data] RDF/SPARQL and consistent metadata about content/structure of ontologies Hi, For the past few days i have been trying to look at RDF/SPARQL
from query designing point of view. What basically i have been trying
to do is to take very simple /user/ queries ("e.g. Bill Gates net
worth") and try to see if i can automatically create the corresponding
queriers in SPARQL. The versatile nature of domain of data stored in
RDF means that data from every domain would have its own ontology. And
the knowledge/understanding of ontology is very much prerequisite to
understanding the data based on that particular ontology.
This seems a little bit of problem to me. This means that we
cannot build queries until we know that structure of ontologies and
since there might be thousands of ontologies how are we supposed to
know about all the ontologies. Moreover everyday new ontologies will be
added to the web.? IS the assumption that the dust will settle after
some time and we will have only very few good ontologies about the
world ? This seems highly restrictive to me.
Obviously I want to write a query processor that is independent on
the ontology that the data i am looking on is based upon. I don't want
to know pre hand what ontology might correspond to the data i am
looking . What i am looking for some consistent way to represent the
/METADATA/ about the structure and content about ontologies so that
from the metadata about the ontology, i can automatically know about
the structure and relevance of the ontology for the query i have in
hand.
Has anybody faced the problem i have highlighted ? or what i am saying is stupid :) and there is some simple way out there ?
Thanks
Ravinder Thakur On 8/27/07,
paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx <
paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: When is the next update of the framework due?
On 8/27/07, paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx <paola.dimaio@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: When is the next update of the framework due? -- ************************************************* Deborah L. MacPherson Projects Director, Accuracy&Aesthetics Specifier, WDG Architecture PLLC The content of this email may contain private and confidential information. Do not forward, copy, share, or otherwise distribute without explicit written permission from all correspondents. ************************************************** _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] entropy, Deborah MacPherson |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Current Semantic Web Layer pizza (was ckae), John F. Sowa |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] entropy, Deborah MacPherson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] entropy, paola . dimaio |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |