How to prove it (01)
http://www.workjoke.com/projoke22.htm (02)
How they prove that all odd integers higher than 2 are prime? (03)
Mathematician: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, and by induction -
every odd integer higher than 2 is a prime.
Physicist: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is an experimental
error, 11 is a prime,...
Engineer: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is a prime, 11 is a
prime,...
Programmer: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a
prime,...
Salesperson: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 -- we'll do for you
the best we can,...
Computer Software Salesperson: 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 will be
prime in the next release,...
Biologist: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 -- results have not
arrived yet,...
Advertiser: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 11 is a prime,...
Lawyer: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 -- there is not enough
evidence to prove that it is not a prime,...
Accountant: 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 is prime, deducing 10% tax
and 5% other obligations.
Statistician: Let's try several randomly chosen numbers: 17 is a prime, 23
is a prime, 11 is a prime...
Professor: 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, and the rest are left as an
exercise for the student.
Computational linguist: 3 is an odd prime, 5 is an odd prime, 7 is an odd
prime, 9 is a very odd prime,...
Psychologist: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is a prime but
tries to suppress it,... (04)
Cheers,
Jay (05)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Menzel" <cmenzel@xxxxxxxx>
To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion (06)
> [Pat wrote:]
>> I welcome the time, hopefully in the relatively near future, when
>> this forum can return to topics relevant to actual ontological
>> engineering. In the meantime, does anyone know how to write an
>> email filter that automatically trashes any message which mentions
>> Peirce?
>
> LOL. Well, in case you're serious:
>
> In Mail.app: Mail -> Preferences -> Rules tab. In the Description
> field enter "Clobber Peirce msgs". From the next three drop down
> lists, in order, select "any", "Message Content", and "Contains".
> Enter "Peirce" in the text field. From the drop down list following
> "Perform the following actions:", select "Delete Message". Click "OK".
>
> Alas, I think you still use Eudora. Perhaps the sys admin for your
> mail server can add a procmail rule! :-)
>
> -chris
> (07)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (08)
|