ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

## Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion

 To: "[ontolog-forum] " "Jay Halcomb" Thu, 16 Aug 2007 08:02:00 -0700 <006201c7e016\$70fbf010\$0100000a@EC29D2D7ECFE48B>
 ```How to prove it    (01) http://www.workjoke.com/projoke22.htm    (02) How they prove that all odd integers higher than 2 are prime?    (03) Mathematician: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, and by induction - every odd integer higher than 2 is a prime. Physicist: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is an experimental error, 11 is a prime,... Engineer: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is a prime, 11 is a prime,... Programmer: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 7 is a prime,... Salesperson: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 -- we'll do for you the best we can,... Computer Software Salesperson: 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 will be prime in the next release,... Biologist: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 -- results have not arrived yet,... Advertiser: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 11 is a prime,... Lawyer: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 -- there is not enough evidence to prove that it is not a prime,... Accountant: 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 is prime, deducing 10% tax and 5% other obligations. Statistician: Let's try several randomly chosen numbers: 17 is a prime, 23 is a prime, 11 is a prime... Professor: 3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, and the rest are left as an exercise for the student. Computational linguist: 3 is an odd prime, 5 is an odd prime, 7 is an odd prime, 9 is a very odd prime,... Psychologist: 3 is a prime, 5 is a prime, 7 is a prime, 9 is a prime but tries to suppress it,...    (04) Cheers, Jay    (05) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Christopher Menzel" To: "[ontolog-forum]" Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2007 10:36 AM Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion    (06) > [Pat wrote:] >> I welcome the time, hopefully in the relatively near future, when >> this forum can return to topics relevant to actual ontological >> engineering. In the meantime, does anyone know how to write an >> email filter that automatically trashes any message which mentions >> Peirce? > > LOL. Well, in case you're serious: > > In Mail.app: Mail -> Preferences -> Rules tab. In the Description > field enter "Clobber Peirce msgs". From the next three drop down > lists, in order, select "any", "Message Content", and "Contains". > Enter "Peirce" in the text field. From the drop down list following > "Perform the following actions:", select "Delete Message". Click "OK". > > Alas, I think you still use Eudora. Perhaps the sys admin for your > mail server can add a procmail rule! :-) > > -chris >    (07) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (08) ```
 Current Thread Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, (continued) Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Jon Awbrey Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Pat Hayes Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Christopher Menzel Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Duane Nickull Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Jon Awbrey Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Christopher Menzel Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Jon Awbrey Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Jon Awbrey Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Christopher Menzel Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Jay Halcomb <= Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Ingvar Johansson Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Pat Hayes Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Jon Awbrey Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Jon Awbrey Re: [ontolog-forum] Correspondence Theory Of Truth -- Discussion, Ingvar Johansson