To: | "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@xxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 15 Aug 2007 08:23:08 -0400 |
Message-id: | <p06110417c2e89fe10c69@[192.168.1.6]> |
>[CM] ... semantics is entirely distinct from > > epistemology. Indeed, by my admittedly dim lights, epistemology -- >> the philosophical analysis of knowledge -- is of at best marginal > > relevance to ontological engineering. (01) [KL] I couldn't disagree more. How do you know what you are calling knowledge really is knowledge? Have you thought about how the systems that make use of this so-called "knowledge" are going to behave when they encounter situations (as they most assuredly will) in which this "knowledge" turns out to be wrong in task-relevant ways? (02) >[CP] when one examines >operational systems (systems that do things) one finds that the deontic and >epistemic elements are key to successful operation - so an implementation >process needs to take account of them. (03) [KL] +1 (04) _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05) |
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Model or Reality, Kathryn Blackmond Laskey |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Model or Reality, Chris Menzel |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Model or Reality, Azamat |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] Model or Reality, Chris Menzel |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |