Waclaw Kusnierczyk schrieb:
> And I can use the term 'truth' to name my left thumb, the concept of a
> pizza as a concept, or whatever else -- and then we can fight over what
> truth is. But if, as it seemed to me, we were discussing the truth of a
> statement or theory as its correctly describing thee facts, then it
> seemed obvious to me that a statement may either describe the facts
> correctly or not (01)
But, and this is what makes me a bit emotional, I have never denied
this. Even using the concept of truthlikeness, *every* statement is
either 100% true or not. (02)
> -- possibly partially correctly in the latter case, but
> still incorrectly. Hence the notion of two-valued truth, and defense
> against degrees of it.
> (03)
But let us end here :-)
Ingvar (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|