Hi Adrian,
That was really quick ( :-}
No question in my mind that the discussion
MUST be both top-down and bottom-up, somehow.
From the top, we have David Walker at GAO
asking powerful sets of questions for the 110th congress to
consider, and the GAO’s Randolf Hite analyzing federal performance
accountability topics which begin to spill into infrastructure design and
maintenance budget items.
The Council on Foreign Relation’s
ex-Anti Terrorism expert, Stephen Flynn, is asking similar questions about
specific disaster zones from a set of 6 ground level case studies.
The Ontolog Forum ONION initiative does
focus upon the middle ground, what you call the business level.
The Taxo-Thesaurus Team is pursuing a related
effort of organizing the Ontolog Forum’s previous presentations so that
our questions, and others, are effectively extracted and presented. Hopefully
in an actionable format.
Let us talk more about your ideas and
reengineering potentials.
Cheers,
Bob
From:
ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Walker
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 11:38
AM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum]
Reasoning about ISO standard 15926
Hi Bob --
That was quick (:-)
I'm not an ISO-15962 expert, but of the references you cite, GridWise seems to
be the closest, as it has to do with energy.
Our concern is mainly that folks are trying to deal with interoperability only
at a (meta)data level, whereas we think there are significant advantages
to raising the discussion up to the business level. There's an
attempt at summarizing the technology we have built to do this in
www.semantic-conference.com/program/sessions/S2.html
and a simple motivating example is
www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/SemanticResolution1.agent
I hope you may have time to look further at our work. Thanks in advance
for comments.
-- Adrian
Internet Business Logic (R)
A Wiki for Executable Open Vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
Shared use is free
Adrian Walker
Reengineering
On 3/25/07, Bob Smith <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Apologies for asking a complicated question before having
started to digest the two references you cite, but is their explicit
interoperability tests of how ISO 15926 works with other resilient-oriented
infrastructure life cycle data integration initiatives such as:
oBIX (Open Building Information Exchange and oBIX v 1.0
http://www.obix.org/ )
NBIMS (National Building Information Management
Standards http://www.wbdg.org/design/bim.php
)
OGC ( Open Geospatial Consortium OWS-3
initiative http://www.opengeospatial.org/pub/www/ows3/index.html
)
GridWise (
http://www.gridwise.org/ )
And with both reasoning and rules for rule-making and policy
integration technologies???
Cheers,
Bob
Hi All --
The ISO15926 standard is used for industrial automation systems and integration
-- integration of life-cycle data for process plants including oil and gas
production facilities.
There is an example of reasoning over part 2 of the standard that one can view,
change and run.
To view the example, please go to
www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/ISO-15962p2-v1.agent
To change or run the example, please go to www.reengineeringllc.com,
click on Internet Business Logic, on GO, and then select ISO-15962p2-v1 .
You are most welcome to add further rules that reason about the ontology.
Thanks for comments,
-- Adrian
Internet Business Logic (R)
A Wiki for Executable Open Vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com
Shared use is free
Adrian Walker
Reengineering
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx