ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Reasoning about ISO standard 15926

To: "'[ontolog-forum] '" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Bob Smith" <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:56:01 -0700
Message-id: <019c01c76f0f$3c093f20$6701a8c0@BobDell>

Hi Adrian,

 

That was really quick ( :-}

 

No question in my mind that the discussion MUST be both top-down and bottom-up, somehow.

 

From the top, we have David Walker at GAO asking powerful sets of questions for the 110th congress to consider, and the GAO’s Randolf Hite analyzing federal performance accountability topics which begin to spill into infrastructure design and maintenance budget items.

 

The Council on Foreign Relation’s ex-Anti Terrorism expert, Stephen Flynn, is asking similar questions about specific disaster zones from a set of 6 ground level case studies.

 

The Ontolog Forum ONION initiative does focus upon the middle ground, what you call the business level.

 

The Taxo-Thesaurus Team is pursuing a related effort of organizing the Ontolog Forum’s previous presentations so that our questions, and others, are effectively extracted and presented. Hopefully in an actionable format.

 

Let us talk more about your ideas and reengineering potentials.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 


From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Walker
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 11:38 AM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Subject: Re: [ontolog-forum] Reasoning about ISO standard 15926

 

Hi Bob --

That was quick (:-)

I'm not an ISO-15962 expert, but of the references you cite, GridWise seems to be the closest, as it has to do with energy.

Our concern is mainly that folks are trying to deal with interoperability only at  a (meta)data level, whereas we think there are significant advantages to  raising the discussion up to the business level.  There's an attempt at summarizing the technology we have built to do this in

     www.semantic-conference.com/program/sessions/S2.html

and a simple motivating example is

     www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/SemanticResolution1.agent

I hope you may have time to look further at our work.  Thanks in advance for comments.

                                        -- Adrian

Internet Business Logic (R)
A Wiki for Executable Open Vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com    Shared use is free

Adrian Walker
Reengineering

On 3/25/07, Bob Smith <bob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Adrian,

 

Apologies for asking a complicated question before having started to digest the two references you cite, but is their explicit interoperability tests of how ISO 15926 works with other resilient-oriented infrastructure life cycle data integration initiatives such as:

 

oBIX (Open Building Information Exchange and oBIX v 1.0  http://www.obix.org/  )

 

NBIMS (National Building Information Management Standards  http://www.wbdg.org/design/bim.php )

 

OGC ( Open Geospatial Consortium OWS-3 initiative     http://www.opengeospatial.org/pub/www/ows3/index.html    )

 

GridWise ( http://www.gridwise.org/ )

 

And with both reasoning and rules for rule-making and policy integration technologies???

 

 

Cheers,

 

Bob


From: ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:ontolog-forum-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adrian Walker
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2007 9:39 AM
To: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ontolog-forum] Reasoning about ISO standard 15926

 

Hi All --

The ISO15926 standard is used for industrial automation systems and integration -- integration of life-cycle data for process plants including oil and gas production facilities.

There is an example of reasoning over part 2 of the standard that one can view, change and run.

To view the example, please go to

       www.reengineeringllc.com/demo_agents/ISO-15962p2-v1.agent

To change or run the example, please go to www.reengineeringllc.com, click on Internet Business Logic, on GO, and then select ISO-15962p2-v1 .

You are most welcome to add further rules that reason about the ontology.

Thanks for comments,                -- Adrian


Internet Business Logic (R)
A Wiki for Executable Open Vocabulary English
Online at www.reengineeringllc.com    Shared use is free

Adrian Walker
Reengineering



_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto: ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 


_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>