To: | "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
---|---|
From: | "Deborah MacPherson" <debmacp@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2007 05:45:03 -0500 |
Message-id: | <48f213f30703120345t4709dcf8s16f69efdb380ebce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Actually, I think ambiguity is good. It serves a purpose. It interferes with information exchange and productivity - but is essential for expressing new ideas or looking at old ideas in new ways.
On 3/11/07, John F. Sowa <sowa@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Debbie and Jack, -- ************************************************* Deborah MacPherson www.accuracyandaesthetics.com www.deborahmacpherson.com The content of this email may contain private confidential information. Do not forward, copy, share, or otherwise distribute without explicit written permission from all correspondents. ************************************************** _________________________________________________________________ Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/ Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01) |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] ambiguity interferes with, Pat Hayes |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ontolog-forum] ambiguity interferes with, Deborah MacPherson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] ambiguity interferes with, John F. Sowa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ontolog-forum] ambiguity interferes with, Pat Hayes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |