[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] Granularity of Representation (was Re: Role of defin

To: "[ontolog-forum] " <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Kathryn Blackmond Laskey <klaskey@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 08:05:55 -0500
Message-id: <p06110440c1fa0aa65f6e@[]>
"The background skeleton" of what?    (01)

At 1:26 AM -0500 2/15/07, John F. Sowa wrote:
>That is why I have recommended a type hierarchy with very
>few axioms as the background skeleton:
>  > Rather than probability, it seems that it would be better
>  > to either choose an agreed to perspective, or if all
>  > possible views are necessary to increase your granularity
>  > of investigation (and ontological representation) to
>  > accommodate all of the possibilities that your perspective
>  > mandates.
>Then each perspective can have a "microtheory" or collection
>of specialized axioms (or constraints) that suit the needs
>or preferences of its particular view.
>John Sowa
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/ 
>Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/ 
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>    (02)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/  
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (03)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>