"The background skeleton" of what? (01)
At 1:26 AM -0500 2/15/07, John F. Sowa wrote:
>That is why I have recommended a type hierarchy with very
>few axioms as the background skeleton:
>
> > Rather than probability, it seems that it would be better
> > to either choose an agreed to perspective, or if all
> > possible views are necessary to increase your granularity
> > of investigation (and ontological representation) to
> > accommodate all of the possibilities that your perspective
> > mandates.
>
>Then each perspective can have a "microtheory" or collection
>of specialized axioms (or constraints) that suit the needs
>or preferences of its particular view.
>
>John Sowa
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
>Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
>Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
>Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
>To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> (02)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (03)
|