That is why I have recommended a type hierarchy with very
few axioms as the background skeleton: (01)
> Rather than probability, it seems that it would be better
> to either choose an agreed to perspective, or if all
> possible views are necessary to increase your granularity
> of investigation (and ontological representation) to
> accommodate all of the possibilities that your perspective
> mandates. (02)
Then each perspective can have a "microtheory" or collection
of specialized axioms (or constraints) that suit the needs
or preferences of its particular view. (03)
John Sowa (04)
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Config: http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Unsubscribe: mailto:ontolog-forum-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|