Thank you, Steve. I like your proposition ... Good start to get a dialog going too!
Before we delve any deeper into the discussion, may I suggest that we:
1. focus on just collecting names of people who are interested to help 'convene' this event, since, like last year, we'll be starting a separate mailing list for this (probably fairly high traffic) discussion.
2. Let's save the dialog, brainstorming and debate till the new list is up. But for now, if one is compelled to talk about the selection of a "Theme" for the event, please do so, by all means ... as this could influence people's decision on whether or not they would want to participate.
3. To save the extra administrivia, I would also suggest we
automatically include people who were already on the [uos-conevne] list
from the last event into the new list of conevners, unless he/she opts
out (in which case, please e-mail me off-line to indicate so). ... Again, if you are interested to be one of the key-participants and/or co-sponsors, please drop us (Steve, Leo and I) a note off-line indicating your interest so that we can include you to the new mailing-list.
Thanks & regards. =ppy
--
On 12/8/06, Steve Ray <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, here's an idea to throw around:
The unique aspect of the Ontolog Forum is that, rather than just convening
conferences where people hear of others' work, the Forum actually establishes
positions. Last year, we produced the communique that represented the commitment
of the major upper ontology stakeholders to work together for a common good. So,
for this coming year, what might be a similar contribution - something that
could represent the combined voice of the community?
How about:
Semantic Mapping
or
How we must learn to love heterogeneity
Given that we will always be in a world where multiple ontologies coexist, what
choices do we have for mapping, or linking, concepts among these ontologies?
Must we be content with simply having humans assert semantic equivalence? If so,
what hope is there for automated integration? Is there potential in using
pattern-matching algorithms? Is it realistic to believe that reasoning systems
will be able to discover and/or prove semantic equivalence between concepts in
different ontologies?
What is the position of the Ontolog Forum?
I await reaction...
-----Original Message-----
From: Obrst, Leo J. [mailto:lobrst@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 10:14 AM
To: Peter P. Yim; [ontolog-forum]
Cc: Steve Ray
Subject: RE: Planning another NIST-Ontolog joint event for April 2007
Peter,
This summarizes well our discussion. We invite you all to participate, and make
suggestions on the wiki on topics you'd like to see addressd this coming year at
the as yet unnamed forum/summit.
Thanks!
Leo
_____________________________________________
Dr. Leo Obrst The MITRE Corporation, Information Semantics
lobrst@xxxxxxxxx
Center for Innovative Computing & Informatics
Voice: 703-983-6770 7515 Colshire Drive, M/S H305
Fax: 703-983-1379 McLean, VA 22102-7508, USA
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter P. Yim [mailto:
peter.yim@xxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 4:30 AM
To: [ontolog-forum]
Cc: Steve Ray; Obrst, Leo J.; Peter Yim
Subject: Planning another NIST-Ontolog joint event for April 2007
All,
For those of us who were at FOIS-2006 and attended the NCOR plenary meeting
there (evening of 09-Nov-2006), you might remember Steve Ray mentioning that
NIST will be hosting their "Interoperability Week" again in 2007, and it is
tentatively scheduled for the week of
23-April-2007 at Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Following the success of the "Upper Ontology Summit"
that Ontolog and NIST co-organized for the same occasion earlier this year
(Interoperability Week - Mar. 2006) we are planning to put together another one
for April 2007.
Steve Ray, Leo Obrst and I had briefly discussed the matter (while we were all
at the FOIS conference) and decided that we will not be limiting ourselves to
just addressing upper ontology issues this time. We also agreed that we wanted
more than the 1.5~2.0 months worth of virtual discussion among the conveners,
prior to the face-to-face event, to allow us to gather more input from the
community and to better plan the program.
This is a call for suggestions and participation.
Similar to our last event (please refer to:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?UpperOntologySummit),
we would want to form a team of "conveners", comprising (besides the
organizers), key-participants and co-sponsors. If you are interested, please
drop us (Steve, Leo and I) a note off-line indicating your interest. We will
start a separate mailing-list shortly to engage this group to help put this
event together.
In particular, if you were one of the conveners of the
Mar.2006 UpperOntologySummit, we look forward to your continued participation.
Also, if your institution or company endorses the type of work we are doing,
please start trying to convince them to be our co-sponsor.
Anything else ... Steve? Leo?
We look forward to hear from as many of you as possible. RSVP now.
Thanks & regards. =ppy
--
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (01)
|