[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ontolog-forum] ontology engineering methodologies

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Peter Yim" <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 08:14:44 -0700
Message-id: <af8f58ac0610110814u4a5352c0w7f504ab78b47551a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> where can i get more [about] methodologies ...    (01)

[ppy]  I have a feeling a lot of us has the same question too ... and
we are here (as a community of practice) to share ideas and compare
notes.    (02)

While we will touch on methodology issue almost everytime we start a
project or major discourse, (off hand) I can point to a few incidences
when Ontolog folks had systematically addressed the issue. You can
find them at:    (03)

1. a discussion on how we should tackle the UBL-Ontology project (back
in 2003) - see: http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl/?Methodology    (04)

2. the methodology adopted for our recent (still current)
Taxo-Thesaurus project that Dr. Bob Smith and Dr. Denise Bedford have
been driving - see:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?OntologTaxoThesaurus#nidNXX    (05)

3. At the recent 9th International Protege Conference at Stanford
University (where our July.2006 face-to-face workshop was colocated) a
whole bunch of people were presenting methodology-related work. For
example, you might want to check out the invited talk by Dr. York Sure
(from Institute AIFB of the University of Karlsruhe, Germany), where
he talked about (among other topics) some of the methodology work they
are doing too - see:
http://protege.stanford.edu/conference/2006/schedule.html ... where
you can find the presentations from (almost) all the speakers
(including York's).    (06)

I look to others in the community to provide further comments ...    (07)

...maybe, Lakshmi, you can share with us your findings regarding
ontology building approaches and methodologies too!    (08)

Regards.  =ppy
--     (09)

On 10/11/06, lakshmi pathi <lakshmipathi_j@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> thanks peter,
>  i agree with you that why single standardized methodology is not possible
> and may be since the field is some what young compared fields like
> programming( idea of pat hayes) etc.,
> one more doubt
> sir can we apply agile kind of metodologies for ontology engineering with we
> can be more specific in ontology building and and the enduser of ontology
> will have at most satisfaction with our ontology.
> i collected some material on 20-25 approches and methodologies to build
> ontologies
> where can i get more methodologies and also i want to develop a frame work
> to compare all the existing methodologies could u suggest some parmeters for
> the framework.
> thanks in advance,
> lakshmi pathi.    (010)

Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/  
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (011)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>