ontolog-forum
[Top] [All Lists]

[ontolog-forum] Fw: [red-team] O Fw: [CIOCD] Draft OMB InformationDissem

To: "Semantic Interoperability Community of Practice" <sicop-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: ONTAC-WG General Discussion <ontac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Brand Niemann" <bniemann@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 09:58:30 -0500
Message-id: <038601c5ed19$b6bfb6f0$1401a8c0@family575i3htt>
FYI, and for your comments.    (01)

Brand    (02)

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brand Niemann" <bniemann@xxxxxxx>
To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@xxxxxxx>; "DRM comment reconciliation
team" <red-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: [red-team] O Fw: [CIOCD] Draft OMB
InformationDisseminationPolicy for Agency Comment    (03)


> Joe, Excellent response and so maybe this mapping should appear somewhere
in
> DRM 2.0, etc. and this relates to my earlier comment about mapping
metadata
> terms to the three Abstract Model functions. Brand
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@xxxxxxx>
> To: "Brand Niemann" <bniemann@xxxxxxx>; "DRM comment reconciliation team"
> <red-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:20 PM
> Subject: RE: [red-team] O Fw: [CIOCD] Draft OMB Information
> DisseminationPolicy for Agency Comment
>
>
> Thanks Brand - sorry for the inconvenience re: my misundertanding.
> Regarding your question below:
>
> > The guidance talks about developing formal information models
> > and list many different types in footnote 14, which is
> > consistent with our SICoP - ONTAC Work Plan to inventory and
> > assess what the Europeans call Semantic Interoperability
> > Assets, but is the DRM Abstract Model just one of those
> > "information models" or does it provide a framework for
> > harmonizing, implementing, interoperating, etc. with all of
> > those "information models"?
>
> I would say it is the second case. That is, the DRM Abstract Model would
> not be one of those "information models"; rather, the DRM Abstract Model
> provides a framework for harmonizing, implementing, interoperating, etc.
> with all of those "information models".
>
> Additional thoughts on the pertinent part of footnote 14, which states
> "Formal information models include but are not limited to data models,
> data dictionaries, thesauri, taxonomies, topic maps, ontologies,
> controlled vocabularies, and exchange packages.": As we know, we can
> easily "associate" (meaning in our minds, at a minimum) each of these
> examples of formal information models with one of the DRM
> standardization areas ("->" means "is associated with):
>
> Data models -> Data Description
> Data dictionaries -> Data Description
> Thesauri -> Data Context
> Taxonomies -> Data Context
> Topic maps -> Data Context
> Ontologies -> Data Context
> Controlled vocabularies -> Data Context
> Exchange packages -> Data Sharing
>
> Thanks,
> Joe
>
> Joseph Chiusano
> Associate
> Booz Allen Hamilton
>
> 700 13th St. NW
> Suite 1100
> Washington, DC 20005
> O: 202-508-6514
> C: 202-251-0731
> Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brand Niemann [mailto:bniemann@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 2:00 PM
> > To: Chiusano Joseph; DRM comment reconciliation team
> > Subject: Re: [red-team] O Fw: [CIOCD] Draft OMB Information
> > DisseminationPolicy for Agency Comment
> >
> > Joe, I am citing the OMB Draft 207d guidance that Mary
> > distributed to the drm team on 11/15, not the DRM 2.0
> > document itself. Brand
> >
> > P.S. Please see the attached.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@xxxxxxx>
> > To: "Brand Niemann" <bniemann@xxxxxxx>; "DRM comment
> > reconciliation team"
> > <red-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:53 AM
> > Subject: RE: [red-team] O Fw: [CIOCD] Draft OMB Information
> > DisseminationPolicy for Agency Comment
> >
> >
> > Brand,
> >
> > So sorry to not understand here: Can you please describe more
> > specifically the "formal information models" you reference?
> > We are doing
> > additional formatting on the document now, and some of the
> > page numbers
> > may be off by a bit. I looked where you indicated, and did not see
> > anything that matched your description.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Joe
> >
> > Joseph Chiusano
> > Associate
> > Booz Allen Hamilton
> >
> > 700 13th St. NW
> > Suite 1100
> > Washington, DC 20005
> > O: 202-508-6514
> > C: 202-251-0731
> > Visit us online@ http://www.boozallen.com
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: red-team-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:red-team-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brand Niemann
> > > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:34 AM
> > > To: DRM comment reconciliation team
> > > Subject: Re: [red-team] O Fw: [CIOCD] Draft OMB Information
> > > DisseminationPolicy for Agency Comment
> > >
> > > Mary and All, Owen and I discussed this at the XML 2005
> > > Conference and both felt it was good guidance.
> > >
> > > I would ask especially with respect to preparation for the
> > > upcoming DRM Abstract Model Workshop that Bryan invited me to
> > > participate in, what is the relationship between the formal
> > > information models mentioned in paragraph 2 on page 3, and
> > > especially footnote 14, and the role/use of the DRM Abstract Model?
> > >
> > > The guidance talks about developing formal information models
> > > and list many different types in footnote 14, which is
> > > consistent with our SICoP - ONTAC Work Plan to inventory and
> > > assess what the Europeans call Semantic Interoperability
> > > Assets, but is the DRM Abstract Model just one of those
> > > "information models" or does it provide a framework for
> > > harmonizing, implementing, interoperating, etc. with all of
> > > those "information models"?
> > >
> > > Brand
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: <Mccaffery.Mary@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <red-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 7:45 PM
> > > Subject: [red-team] O Fw: [CIOCD] Draft OMB Information
> > > Dissemination Policy for Agency Comment
> > >
> > >
> > > > All,
> > > >
> > > >     OMB has issued their 207 D policy out for comment to
> > > the Agencies.
> > > > It does rely on the DRM.  I am going to send this out to
> > > the entire drm
> > > > team to give them a heads up.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Mary E McCaffery
> > > > Senior Advisor
> > > > Assistant Administrator
> > > > Office of Environmental Information
> > > > U.S.EPA
> > > >
> > > > 202-564-2704
> > > > ----- Forwarded by Mary McCaffery/DC/USEPA/US on
> > 11/15/2005 07:41 PM
> > > > -----
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >                       "Schlarman, Glenn R."
> > > >                       <Glenn_R._Schlarman@O         To:
> > > CIO-DEPTCIO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >                       MB.EOP.GOV>                   cc:
> > >
> > > >                       Sent by: CIOs and
> > > Subject: [CIOCD] Draft
> > > OMB Information Dissemination Policy for Agency Comment
> > > >                       Deputy CIOs
> > > >                       <CIO-DEPTCIO@listserv
> > > >                       .gsa.gov>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >                       11/15/2005 04:23 PM
> > > >                       Please respond to
> > > >                       "Schlarman, Glenn R."
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Attached for comment by Wednesday, November 23 is a draft
> > of policy
> > > > required by section 207d of the E-Government Act.  The
> > > draft addresses
> > > > promoting greater public access to government
> > information, improving
> > > > information resource management, and use of the FEA data
> > > reference model
> > > > (which as you know is also currently out for your comment).
> > > >
> > > > Please provide your comments to Dan Costello at
> > > Dcostell@xxxxxxxxxxx,
> > > > Kimberly Nelson knelson@xxxxxxxxxxx, and me at
> > gschlarm@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > (Yes, we will be working the Wednesday before and the Friday after
> > > > Thanksgiving.
> > > >
> > > > Thank You
> > > > Glenn
> > > >  (See attached file: 207d Draft Policy.pdf)
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > --------------
> > > ----
> > >
> > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Message Archives: http://cosine.cim3.net/forum/red-team/
> > > > Shared Files: http://cosine.cim3.net/file/work/DRM/drm_redteam/
> > > > Community Portal: http://cosine.cim3.net/
> > > > To Post: mailto:red-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Community Wiki: http://cosine.cim3.net/wiki/
> > > >
> > >
> > >  _________________________________________________________________
> > > Message Archives: http://cosine.cim3.net/forum/red-team/
> > > Shared Files: http://cosine.cim3.net/file/work/DRM/drm_redteam/
> > > Community Portal: http://cosine.cim3.net/
> > > To Post: mailto:red-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Community Wiki: http://cosine.cim3.net/wiki/
> > >
> >
>
>  _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://cosine.cim3.net/forum/red-team/
> Shared Files: http://cosine.cim3.net/file/work/DRM/drm_redteam/
> Community Portal: http://cosine.cim3.net/
> To Post: mailto:red-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Community Wiki: http://cosine.cim3.net/wiki/    (04)

Attachment: 207d Draft Policy.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (01)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>