Evan, (01)
Thank you for the putting up such a compelling case. (02)
All: Prior to further discussion at the planning team meeting,
let's try to have more input ... please, everybody. (03)
Regards. =ppy
-- (04)
ewallace@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote Thu, 5 May 2005 16:50:10 -0400 (EDT):
> Peter called for discussion of pending logistical issues:
>
>
>>2. A few issues were deferred to discussion at the planning
>>level. However, we definitely need input to gauge what the
>>community wants. Therefore, please voice your opinion by posting
>>them to this forum. The particular issues we went over during
>>today's call include:
>>
>>(a) change of the regular Thursday conference call time - ref:
>>http://ontolog.cim3.net/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?ConferenceCall_2005_05_05#nidCGB
>
>
> I have been reticent on this issue because I can't say how much I can
> participate in this group in the future, even if the meeting time were to
> be changed. However, it is very frustrating to not be able to participate
> in events such as last week's discussion* or talks like Mark Greave's
> talk next week. Furthermore, the current regular meeting time guarantees
> weak participation, at best, from a whole set of people (SWBPD working group
> members) who might otherwise round out the expertise of the ontolog
>community.
>
> For an alternate standard ontolog meeting slot, I would suggest Monday or
> Wednesday at the same time as the current slot. A last disruptive
> alternative to changing the regular time, would be to schedule only
> special events at a different time.
>
> * The conflict with last week's Ontologies and Tagging discussion was with
> the Rules Language workshop [1] rather than any SWBPD meeting. The rules
> workshop had many of the usual suspects from SWBPD: Mike Uschold, Deb
> McGuinness, Jeff Pan and myself but it also included additional key
> experts from the Semantic Web and rule communities such as Ian Horrocks,
> Peter Patel-Schneider, Bijan Parsia, Pat Hayes and Benjamin Grosof. This
> was ironic, since the tagging discussion really needed to be balanced by
> some participants from the SW community.
>
> -Evan
>
>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2004/12/rules-ws/
> _________________________________________________________________
> Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
>http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
> Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
> Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
> To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (05)
|