The [ontolog-dev] discussion space is up and going now. (01)
Do note that one would need to be a subscriber to post. However,
the forum archives are openly accessible (to anyone, not just
subscribers). Please make a note of the URL: (02)
[ontolog-dev] Forum Archives:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-dev/ (03)
Cheers. =ppy
-- (04)
Peter Yim wrote Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:27:56 -0800:
> Further to our discussion at today's Ontolog community conference call,
>
> both Peter Denno and Adam Pease have agreed to move their discussion on
> the SUO-KIF validator over to the [ontolog-dev] forum (archived mailing
> list). (05)
> ... therefore, anyone who is interested to track that discourse, or is
> interested in future in depth discussion on code and tools should
> subscribe yourself to that list. You can do so yourself at:
> http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-dev
> or, send me an e-mail offline, if you want me to get you subscribed.
>
> Regards. =ppy
> -- (06)
> Peter Yim wrote Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:42:21 -0800: (07)
>> > [denno] I was looking for the correct forum for this
>> > dialog. Ontolog might not be it, but scanning old
>> > email I couldn't think who else to send it to!). (08)
>> [ppy] Good point, Peter. With the Ontolog discussion space (ref:
>> http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ ), we actually have list called
>> [ontolog-dev] that would probably be an appropriate venue for
>> discussions like this. That list has hardly any traffic and only a
>> cursory number of subscribers now. (09)
>> Let's consider using that for in depth code/tools related discussions
>> (this will be especially crucial if traffic volume explodes, as they
>> will, for this kind of discussions.) (010)
>> Of course, we could start any number of forums/lists too, if need be. (011)
>> Members, let's hear your thoughts about this. (012)
>> Who would want to move the discussion over to that? Please indicate if
>> you would want to be subscribed if we do decide to move the discussion
>> over. (013)
>> Other suggestions & recommendations regarding this matter are welcomed.
>
>
>> Regards. =ppy
>> -- (014)
>> Peter Denno wrote Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:58:53 -0500:
>>
>>> Adam, et al.,
>>>
>>> I wrote a small tool to check a few aspects of the 'structural
>>> integrity' of ontologies written in SUO KIF. ...[snip]...
>
>
>
_________________________________________________________________
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Subscribe/Unsubscribe/Config:
http://ontolog.cim3.net/mailman/listinfo/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (015)
|