[Top] [All Lists]

In depth code/tools discussion [was-Re: [ontolog-forum] SUO KIF testing]

To: "[ontolog-forum]" <ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Peter Yim <peter.yim@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 08:42:21 -0800
Message-id: <423078ED.1040800@xxxxxxxx>
 > [denno] I was looking for the correct forum for this
 > dialog. Ontolog might not be it, but scanning old
 > email I couldn't think who else to send it to!).    (01)

[ppy] Good point, Peter. With the Ontolog discussion space (ref: 
http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ ), we actually have list called 
[ontolog-dev] that would probably be an appropriate venue for 
discussions like this. That list has hardly any traffic and only 
a cursory number of subscribers now.    (02)

Let's consider using that for in depth code/tools related 
discussions (this will be especially crucial if traffic volume 
explodes, as they will, for this kind of discussions.)    (03)

Of course, we could start any number of forums/lists too, if need be.    (04)

Members, let's hear your thoughts about this.    (05)

Who would want to move the discussion over to that? Please 
indicate if you would want to be subscribed if we do decide to 
move the discussion over.    (06)

Other suggestions & recommendations regarding this matter are 
welcomed.    (07)

Regards.  =ppy
--    (08)

Peter Denno wrote Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:58:53 -0500:
> Adam, et al.,
> I wrote a small tool to check a few aspects of the 'structural integrity' of 
> ontologies written in SUO KIF. ...[snip]...
Message Archives: http://ontolog.cim3.net/forum/ontolog-forum/
Shared Files: http://ontolog.cim3.net/file/
Community Wiki: http://ontolog.cim3.net/wiki/ 
To Post: mailto:ontolog-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    (09)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>